PLUGS & DOTTLES / 07-03 / Page Two
Newsletter of the Nashville Scholars
of the Three Pipe Problem / Est. 1979

HOME | CALENDAR | MEETING NEWS | SITE MAP | NASHVILLE WEATHER
Subscribe to:
Plugs and Dottles | WelcomeHolmes

Book Review
by Adrian Nebbett

The Alternative Sherlock Holmes by Peter Ridgway Watt & Joseph Green, the recently mentioned book about pastiches and parodies, arrived here this morning. I've dipped in and have come to the conclusion that it is a dipping-into sort of book. Its breadth of scope is admirable, but sadly leads to a lack of depth, but its organisation leaves a lot to be desired.

The book attempts to categorise the stories under very broad chapter headings:

Watson's Unchronicled Cases and Their Pastiches: which deals with stories based on the untold stories mentioned throughout the canon.

Period Pastiches: Stories set during the time period covered by the canon, and in roughly canonical locations.

Non-Period Pastiches: Stories that take place in a time and/or place outside of the canonical span.

Friends, Relations, and One Enemy: Stories about other canonical characters, or descendants of Holmes.

Parodies and Impostors: Parodies and Characters whose names are wordplays on Holmes'.

Copies and Rivals: Other golden age detectives.

Which is probably as good a set of distinctions as you'll get - any attempts to categorise more specifically, inevitably end up in hundreds of different categories, most of which only have one story in them.

The main fault of the book is its uncertainty over how to deal with the stories. Each gets a basic title/author introduction, followed by what is referred to a number of times through the book as a "review" but which is in reality, at best, a synopsis. These are printed in a reduced typeface, which seems to suggest that they are quotes from somewhere, although no indication is given as to whether this is the case, or where that somewhere might be. These vary in detail from those which give away the entire story (including the solution to the mystery - something I've tried to avoid in my own plot summaries) to those that seem to be rather irrelevant, and give no information at all. The "review" of Edward Hanna's The Whitechapel Horrors, for example, reads: "Not for the first time, and probably not for the last, Holmes has to tackle these awful murders in London's East End." No mention that these awful murders are the work of Jack the Ripper, which would seem to be fairly central to the object of the book, or that Holmes is used by Hanna as a device for exploring the various solutions offered to the Ripper mystery, rather than an attempt to solve the mystery.

Also lacking throughout are opinions or evaluations of the stories, beyond the fact that all science fiction stories are ipso facto appalling, and that Val Andrews is quite excellent (there is a distinct Anglo-centric bias to the book - we sense that English pastiches are more acceptable than American ones).

The first chapter is the best organised, grouping stories based on the same unchronicled case together, and also grouping the cases together under the canonical story in which they were mentioned. This gives a good basic insight into the different spins that have been put on the tales, and an indication of which titles have sparked off inspiration in the most writers.

The second and third chapters are arranged by publication date, which would be interesting if some attempt was made to analyse trends in the market, but unfortunately becomes simply a listing of titles and authors in many cases. Perhaps the authors have included stories that they have not read themselves for the sake of inclusiveness. A more formally structured catalogue presentation would have been more appealing, and more useful - a listing arranged by author (or even title) would have made the book more accessible.

The Non-Period chapter suffers most from this publication chronology approach. A chapter dealing with Holmes in other historical periods is surely crying out to have its material organised by the period that the stories are set in. Again this chapter also suffers from the anti-science-fiction stance of the authors. If one is writing an account that by its nature deals in large part with that particular genre then an interest in the topic on the part of the writer, might make it more enjoyable for the reader. At the very least an objective overview of the subject would be preferable.

A further setback of this approach is that authors' works are split up. An approach that considered individual authors over the entire span of their works would also have been a more interesting approach. Instead, here we have individual books by the same author being mentioned many pages apart from each other, and even in separate chapters. Michael Kurland's first Moriarty book, for instance is mentioned in the Period Pastiches chapter, while the second is in the chapter dealing with other canonical characters. The third, published in 2001, is not mentioned at all. (next column, please...)




If only Holmes and Watson could have read Plugs and Dottles...Holmes would not have balled it up and tossed it on the luggage rack!




next column, please...

The parodies chapter is based on the assumption that a parody must of necessity have a main character whose name is a burlesque of Holmes' (and is categorised again by publication chronology, but thereafter by the name of the character). This leads to many parodies that feature Holmes under his actual name being included in the pastiche sections and referred to as such. Again many of the summaries that accompany the headings are so cursory - merely a mention of the author and the story title in which the character appeared - as to make one wish for a cataloguing rather than the"entertaining narrative" approach of this book, which results in much repetition of the phrase "They appeared in...a short story by..." Again this would have made the information more accessible, while also reducing the number of pages and thus presumably the price.

The structure also makes it seem strange that a book published in June 2003 only includes stories published up to 2001. Surely, with this chronological approach, and particularly bearing in mind the lack of any structure or discussion within each chapter other than listing the books published each year with a synopsis, it would not have been terribly difficult, particularly in this electronic age, to add last year's publications onto the end of the appropriate chapters.

At £45 the book is far from being cheap, but presumably this is controlled by its limited readership appeal, and ultimately it is consideration of that readership that is perhaps lacking. Much of the information here is available in a more useful format elsewhere (most notably the print/on-line/CD-Rom versions of De Waal), and very little information is added to what is already available. The serious collector will already know most of what is here - no research into authors, or the background to the stories is evident - which would appeal to those already interested in the subject, while the breadth and lack of detail hold little of interest for the casual reader - if you haven't read the stories, then an approach that veers between on the one hand simply telling you they exist, and on the other giving the ending away is probably not what you're looking for.

A work on this scale cannot hope to be comprehensive, but there are some surprising gaps here. Nicholas Meyer's third pastiche, The Canary Trainer, is noticeably absent, as are all of Frank Thomas's novels (cynics might say understandably so, but they are historically important in a survey of pastiches as being the first series of Holmes novels to be published in
the mass market), and Robert Lee Hall's The King Edward Plot: The Pursuit of the Houseboat, the first novel-length story to feature Holmes as a character, gets a only a brief mention (inaccurately) as another book by Bangs which contained a Sherlock Holmes pastiche, under the erroneous title "In the Pursuit of the Houseboat" and does not appear in the index.

A Sherlockian pastiche-aware proofreader would have been a considerable bonus to the book: Typo's are frequent, particularly in titles and character names. OK, it may not be a major problem that Quinn Fawcett's character Penelope Gatspy is referred to three times as Penelope Gatsby (which every reader of Fawcett's believes she should have been called, anyway), but it

still rankles (Particularly at that price). There are also occasional awkwardnesses which seem to suggest that the book was cut and pasted from bits and pieces from here and there: the section on John Gardner's Moriarty novels begins "In 1974 John Gardner published the first of his two Moriarty novels The Return of Moriarty", followed by a 5 line synopsis, then "In 1975 John Gardner published The Revenge of Moriarty", and a 3 line synopsis of that. Not strictly wrong use of English, I suppose, but still not terribly elegant.

Endnotes to the chapters are also awkward, giving bibliographical data that would have been more useful in the main text, or as footnotes, but more importantly, jumping about all over the place, defying logical structure. The notes on one page of text, for example, are numbered 8, 23, 1, 27 in that order. Call me old-fashioned, but I do like my end-notes to be in the same order as the text, so I can stick my bookmark in the back and go from one to the next as I get to them, I don't want to have to search through 50 pages of references each time I come to one. These would have been much better presented as a bibliography (the Bibliography that is presented as such is rather cursory, listing a few collections of pastiches - but not all those in the book, and a couple of reference works).

All that said, this is a good first effort at what is by its nature a fairly unmanageable topic - and there are a few things in it that I didn't know - and hopefully will lead on to more in depth studies of the genre, dealing with major and minor trends in pastiche-writing, giving more background on the authors. Research into/ reading of all the stories listed, or separating out those that have not been read by the authors into an appendix would help too. It will probably serve best as a memory-jogger for those who have read the stories, but can't remember what they were about.

Editor's note: British born (hence some of the spellings above), Adrian is "our man in Malaysia." He teaches at a prestigious boys' school there and was able to come to Nashville several years ago during his summer vacation. We welcomed him with a picnic - what else? - and made him a member of the Nashville Scholars. Judging from the review above, he's a Scholar indeed.

If the review seems a bit familiar, it was posted on WelcomeHolmes recently. Gael Stahl suggested it be included in our newsletter and we were more than happy to oblige.






End of Issue | Back to Page One

TOP | HOME | CALENDAR | MEETING NEWS | NASHVILLE WEATHER


I am a brain, Watson.
The rest of me is a mere appendix.
Rathbone as Holmes
Join us at WelcomeHolmes
Subscribe to WelcomeHolmes
Powered by www.egroups.com
The Nashville Scholars'
discussion group.

TOP