 |
SIGNIFICANT
SHERLOCKIANS INTERVIEWS |
| |
An Interview with
Christopher and Barbara Roden
The
Rodens with Otto Penzler at Mysterious Bookshoppe
New York City, Jan 2001
The People Behind Calabash Press and Ash-Tree Press
My sincere thanks to both Christopher and Barbara for taking the time
to respond with these most interesting replies to my questions. Like
me, I hope you find their work fascinating, and, in the best spirit of Sherlockiana
-- keeping green the memory of Holmes. And they ARE the best looking
couple in Sherlockiana!
Jim Hawkins, 18 Feb 2001
|
| |
Jim Hawkins:
Barbara, please tell us about the Stormy Petrels.
Barbara:
There were three or four of us belonging to the Bootmakers of Toronto
who lived in the Vancouver area, and in 1987 we met for dinner and a viewing
of the play THE HOUND OF LONDON. It was a sort of testing of the waters
- was there enough interest to warrant founding a society? - and we decided
yes. Over the next couple of years we met in various places before settling
on one location, and by then we were getting 20 - 25 people at a meeting,
which was great. I ended up acting as president for a time, and spent two
years editing the group's newsletter, THE PETREL FLYER, which was great
fun.
The group is still going strong, although it's had to find a new meeting
place. Living 200 miles north of Vancouver, we don't get to meetings very
much, but we keep up with the group via the FLYER, which is also still
going.
|
| |
JH:
As a journalist, was your interest at first in Sherlock as a character
or Conan Doyle as a writer?
Barbara:
I have to be honest and say that Holmes came first: although I'd read
a few of the stories at age eight, and actually played Holmes in a school
radio play version of 'The Red-Headed League' at age nine, it wasn't
until I was twelve, and we read 'The Speckled Band' at school,
that I got hooked. When I did get interested in Holmes, though, it was
total: I ate, drank, breathed, and slept Holmes and Watson!
At about the age of twelve, though, I stumbled across a couple of Conan
Doyle's supernatural stories; and as I've always loved spooky tales, I
looked for more of them, and so came across his other works at the same
time that I was discovering Holmes. I thought it was wonderful that the
same person who wrote the Holmes tales had also written all these other
great stories.
JH:
What event took you to England in 1992?
Barbara:
A Sherlockian friend, Roger Johnson, was getting married, and a girlfriend
and I were going over for that. I'd been to England three times previously,
but my last trip had been in 1985, so I was thrilled at the chance to
go back, see London, travel a bit, meet some friends, and attend a Sherlock
Holmes weekend. I've always loved England: not just for Sherlock Holmes,
but for the history, the countryside, the architecture, the people,
everything. I certainly never thought I'd end up living there, though!
|
| |
JH:
Was there a mentor, one single person, who got you started on the path
to Sherlock Holmes?
Barbara:
Not really; unless you count my grade seven teacher, Mrs Young, who
decided we should read 'The Speckled Band' and then do a project
on it. I wrote a play called THE SECRET OF SHERLOCK OF HOLMES (this was
in 1976, long before the Jeremy Brett play!), and played Holmes, which
was great fun. I still have the play: I found it the other day when we
were clearing some boxes out of the garage!
My parents were also instrumental in keeping me on the Sherlockian
path: they were very encouraging, and never treated the whole thing like
some silly phase I'd outgrow. Maybe they were thankful my hero was Holmes
and not a rock star!
JH:
Tell us about meeting David Stuart Davies, and the decision to write
'The Doctor's Page' for the Sherlock Holmes Gazette.
Barbara:
I met David in 1992, at a Northern Musgraves Sherlock Holmes Society
weekend in Bradford, which my girlfriend and I attended while we were
in England. His HOLMES OF THE MOVIES had been one of the first Holmes
reference books I'd bought, and after I moved there Christopher and I
lived quite close to Huddersfield, where David lived, so we saw a lot
of him and Kathryn.
When David started editing the GAZETTE he was looking for one
or two people to contribute regular columns: as an editor, I know how
nice it is to have regular contributions for each issue - it gives you
one or two fewer things to have to worry about! I forget whose idea the
'Doctor's Page' was, but I liked the idea of a column that could take
a roving look at ACD's life and his other works. And when there's a 'theme'
issue, there's almost always something in Conan Doyle that I can write
about: he was such a versatile man and writer.
|
| |
JH:
And if you don't mind a personal question, tell us how you met Christopher.
Barbara:
When I went to England in 1992, I wrote to two or three people who
I'd become friends with through correspondence, but had never met: I wanted
to see if we could meet up, so I could put some faces to names. Christopher
was one of the three: we went out for dinner, and then saw each other
two days later at the Musgraves' weekend in Bradford, and within twelve
weeks I had moved to England. I think we both knew pretty quickly that
something like that was going to happen; but I think we were both a little
surprised at how quickly things moved!
JH:
Tell us of your interest in ghost stories and the Ghost Story Society.
Barbara:
I've always loved ghost stories - they were my first love, even before
Holmes! Of the three people I wanted to meet in England, two were very
involved with the Ghost Story Society, and one of them lived not far from
us in Chester. When she decided not to edit the group's newsletter anymore,
I was asked if I wanted to take it on, and I said yes. Then, a few months
later, the fellow who was running the society decided he wanted out, and
rather than see the group fold, Christopher and I took over the running
of it, which meant editing the journal. It was a once-a-year affair, but
we've expanded it to a thrice-yearly publication of more than 80 pages
an issue.
An offshoot of all this work for the society was the formation of our
supernatural publishing imprint, Ash-Tree Press. We decided to reprint
some of the classic ghost story collections which people wanted to read
but which had been out of print for decades. It started off as a bit of
a hobby, and is now our main business; and last November we were honored
to find we'd won a World Fantasy Award for our overall achievement. Not
bad, considering we're only in our third full year of operation!
|
| |
JH:
Christopher, your first encounter with Holmes. Was it a Book?...a
Movie?... Television?
Christopher:
Back in the 1950s, John Murray used to produce editions of the Holmes
stories for schoolboys. I remember having one given to me when I was around
the age of 7 or 8: yellow cloth, red lettering, red illustration-but I
don't recall how it was titled. I do recall that 'The Final Problem'
was one of the stories, and I also recall that there was Paget's illustration
of the struggle above the Reichenbach Falls. Whether it was a visual image
that first interested me in reading the story is difficult to say at this
remove. I do know that once I had read it, I was hooked.
JH:
Was Doyle studied as an important writer in any school you attended?
Christopher:
No. About the only nod to adventure stories was to John Buchan's 'The
Thirty-Nine Steps'; for the rest, read Dickens, J. Meade Faulkner,
Wilke Collins, D.H. Lawrence, and other likely candidates. Conan Doyle,
of course, had a place in the school library, but it was outside of school
where I encountered Professor Challenger, who followed on from Holmes
in my introduction to ACD.
JH:
How did your being selected as one of the editors for the Oxford Sherlock
Holmes come about?
Christopher:
Well, I had founded the ACD Society in 1989 and had struck up a good
relationship with Owen Dudley Edwards. I think Owen was reasonably impressed
with the work I was doing with ACD - The Journal of the Arthur Conan
Doyle Society, and had respect for the work I was doing with the society
generally. So, when he was approached by Oxford to be General Editor of
the series, he approached me to ask whether I would like to join the editorial
team, and if so, which collections would I like to edit? Unhesitatingly,
I chose Memoirs and The Sign of the Four-the latter because
it has always been my favourite of the long stories.
|
| |
JH:
What, if any, collaboration took place between you and the other editors
in the Oxford series?
Christopher:
Basically, we were all left to do our own job, with material being
discussed and channelled through Owen Dudley Edwards. I remember Richard
Lancelyn Green and I had a lot of discussion about the worth of name sources,
and how far we felt it was worth delving into them when, in many cases,
suggestions made previously were based on little more than speculation.
And a certain blueprint for the series was laid down by Owen in the early
days, i.e., like deciding to include 'The Cardboard Box' in its
rightful place in the Memoirs. Other than that, there was no general,
organised collaboration.
JH:
And what did you learn about Doyle or Holmes during the process?
Christopher:
It's hard to say whether I learnt anything about either Doyle or Holmes
during the editing process. I know it was damned hard work, which involved
hours of reading, checking, cross-checking, comparing texts, proof-reading,
writing, and re-writing, before it was all done. Nonetheless, it was a
most enjoyable experience and I was particularly gratified to receive
enthusiastic comments from Professor Wallace Robson, who also worked on
the series.
JH:
Are there any new revelations about Doyle or Holmes presented in that
material?
Christopher:
Let's put it another way: I doubt anyone reading the Introductions
or Explanatory Notes for a given volume would go away not having learned
something new. Owen and myself, in particular, were at pains to include
as much material relating to Conan Doyle himself in both Introductions
and Notes. We saw our task not so much as presenting yet another volume
of Sherlock Holmes stories, but as trying to place the achievement of
Conan Doyle in the overall context of English Literature. I like to think
that, in the main, we succeeded in doing that.
What we have to bear in mind about the Oxford was that it was not a
collection produced solely for Sherlockians, who really number only a
few thousand around the world. If you remember that Oxford produced, and
sold, some 100,000 sets of the hardback edition, it puts into perspective
how generally oriented that edition had to be. Of course there were complaints
from Sherlockians: little things like the profusion of asterisks throughout
the text (which is Oxford's way of doing things, not ours - but what workable
alternatives are there?); changes made, for example like the date in 'Wisteria
Lodge'; decisions that were taken over 'Cave' or 'Cove' in 'The Red Circle'.
But whoever produced such an ambitious work would never have satisfied
all of the Sherlockians. Again, this wasn't an annotated edition solely
for consumption by Sherlockians: if it worked in introducing more people
to Sherlock Holmes, and particularly the works of Conan Doyle, it served
part of its purpose-and I maintain that it is the finest edition of the
canon produced to date (but then, I would, wouldn't I?).
JH:
And now, some questions for both of you.
David Stuart Davies met his wife Kathryn by becoming involved in Sherlock
Holmes. Was it Doyle or Holmes that brought you together? Or neither?
Rodens:
I think we both believe that it was fate that brought us together. Since
one of us lived in England and the other in Vancouver, there had to be a
greater power than Holmes or Conan Doyle at work. Barbara had joined the
ACD Society in 1990 and we had been corresponding for a couple of years.
When she was making a trip to England in March1992 we arranged to meet-by
mid-June 1992, she was living in England. You could say that had it not
been for our interest in Conan Doyle and Sherlock Holmes we never would
have met-but we have so many other interests in common besides Doyle and
Holmes that it's quite likely that at some stage our paths would have crossed.
JH:
Do you get to travel much being involved as you are with Doyle and ghosts?
Or does the business of preparing books and newsletters keep you home most
of the time?
Rodens:
We haven't done too much travelling in the last year, since our move
to Canada, though we did drive the 5,000-odd mile round trip from British
Columbia to Toronto to attend the Lasting Impressions conference
of the Bootmakers of Toronto in June '97. In addition, we had our first
child in September, so recent months have been occupied in other ways.
But yes, our business is that of full-time publishers, and we essentially
manage all aspects of the business ourselves, so our time is very committed.
And in addition to our work: Ash-Tree Press and Calabash Press, we run
two literary societies (The ACD Society and the Ghost Story Society),
so we have leisure time commitments, too, which make considerable demands
on us.
What we hope we're doing through Calabash Press, particularly with
our series 'The Case Files of Sherlock Holmes', is maintaining
the interest of existing Sherlockians and also developing the interest
of newcomers. There are some people who believe it's all been done already,
that there is nothing new that anyone could possibly say about Sherlock
Holmes. Our contributors to 'The Case Files' are already proving that
that is very much not the case. If we can continue to publish a quality
product, which is appealing, original, and value for money, then we are
more than happy.
END OF INTERVIEW
|
| |
LINKS
The
Rodens may be contacted also via this address:
P.O. Box 1360
Ashcroft, British Columbia, Canada V0K 1A0
Tel: (250) 453-2045
Fax: (250) 453-2075
ashtree@ash-tree.bc.ca
|